About

If you’re on your phone, you’ll have to turn it on its side to see the screenshots of my spreadsheet. Everything else is totally legible whether you’re on your laptop or your phone.


There’s one page for each article JK writes.

So go to 537597.xyz (or click Home at the top of any page) and you’ll see, for example, “JK 15-16 May 2022”. Click on that (or on “READ MORE” under the spreadsheet screenshot) to go to the page for the games that took place from the 15th to the 16th of May.


On each page, under “Game 1”, “Game 2” etc, is JK’s recommended betting angle (including the odds - fractional and decimal - and whether the bet lost $100 or, if it won, how much it returned). I’m pretending we’ve bet $100 on each game.

Examples:


Winning bet:

Game 5 | Sunday 2pm

West Ham vs Manchester City

JK betting angle Jarrod Bowen to score
Odds 7/2 4.5
$100 returned $450

(Bowen scored.)


Losing bet:

Game 3 | Sunday 2pm

Leeds vs Brighton

JK betting angle Leeds to win & under 2.5 goals
Odds 5/1 6.0
Lost $100

(The game finished Leeds 1, Brighton 1.)


Bad losing bet:

Game 5 | Saturday 3pm

Wolves vs Brighton

JK betting angle Wolves to win & under 2.5 goals
Odds 4/1 5.0
Lost $100

(The game finished Wolves 0, Brighton 3.)



Next, you’ll find his score prediction (with the fractional odds).

Examples:


Winning bet (nailed the correct score):

(Tottenham v Leicester on 1 May)

Score 3-1
JK score prediction 3-1
Odds 9/1
$10 returned $100

Right result but the wrong score - e.g. he predicted 2-0 but it was 1-0 OR he predicted 0-0 but it was 1-1:

(Villa v Palace on 15 May)

Score 1-1
JK score prediction 2-2
Odds 12/1
Lost $10

Wrong result but not completely the wrong team - i.e. he predicted a draw but one of the teams won OR he predicted one of the teams would win but it was a draw:

(Tottenham v Burnley on 15 May)

Score 1-0
JK score prediction 1-1
Odds 17/2
Lost $10

Big fail. He picked one team to win but the other team won:

(Everton v Chelsea on 1 May)

Score 1-0
JK score prediction 0-2
Odds 13/2
Lost $10

Next is “What JK said” which just repeats what he wrote in his article but with all the extraneous stuff (links and pictures) removed.

I’ve made some of the more interesting stuff he wrote bold. Sometimes he suggests other bets that he didn’t end up choosing as his betting angle. If those bets ended up winning, they will be bold. It’s pretty arbitrary what gets to be bold. It’s just meant to draw your eye to certain things in case you’re skimming through.


Next you get my little summary of how his betting angle got on.

Again, green is good, red is bad.

So “Maddison (13/2 to score first) did” is green because his betting angle of Maddison to score first (@ 13/2) came in - Maddison did score first.

And “Leicester (17/10 to win) 0, Villa 0” is red because his betting angle of Leicester to win (@17/10) lost - Leicester didn’t win.

If his betting angle was a double, there may be green text and red text together. So, for example, “Villa 1, Palace 1. Both teams to score & over 2.5 goals was 6/5.” Both teams did score so that part’s green, but there weren’t over 2.5 goals, hence the red.

I add in other very simple bits of relevant information from after the match too, in black. For example, if his betting angle was “under 2.5 goals”, I’ll say what the combined xG of both teams was.

The final score will always be written here too.


As far as the spreadsheet screenshots go, don’t worry about the colours. All the information’s there and you should be able to work out what you’re looking at. I’ll explain more when I see you if you’re interested.


PS. As you know (Mick: “He’s not pulling up any trees”), this whole thing is a waste of time because it’s pretty clear that he’s not going to consistently win unless he’s lucky.